There’s precious little time for our characters in this action
packed finale
The original title of this third installment in the Hobbit series was The Hobbit: There and Back Again. I assumed that Warner Brothers
altered the original title because it’s a dangerous one for a movie that is
bordering on been-there-done-that familiarity. Turns out, The Battle of the Five Armies is the more fitting
title for a movie that is just about five armies fighting. Seriously,
there’s very little time for anything else.
The battle is worth your time; the action scenes are the best
in the whole series. But a lot of magic was lost.
It still tops in scope, fantasy storytelling and big-canvas beauty. Yet somehow you can’t quite forget that The Hobbit films never matched up to
Peter Jackson’s Lord of the
Rings trilogy. Perhaps no series could.
What separated them at the beginning, and had such potential for this
series, was the miniature-sized sweetness and heart of the main
characters. Martin Freeman brings more to his hobbit than Elijah Wood did and I developed more fondness for this series' merry band of characters.
There wasn’t much of that stuff in the third installment (and there is way too little
screen time for Bilbo Baggins), but when tragedy threatens these characters we
loved, it is all the more compelling for it.
Amazingly from fantasy master Peter Jackson, the final moments fall very
flat and threaten to make to make the whole Tolkien series feel quite
pointless. I’ll ignore that disappointing end because I sure did enjoy the
ride.
Simply put: A middling Middle Earth installment; go for the
action. This one is only a two hours and 24 minutes investment.
Award potential: Even a few technical award nominations would be a
surprise. It’s not even on the short list for makeup. The Oscars have moved on.
The ten buck review: Worth ten bucks. This battle-centric
film is worth the 3D hassle.
No comments:
Post a Comment